2013年5月14日火曜日

www2013一日目


リオで行われているwww2013に参加したので,メモ.

初日は13時についてWSに以下の参加.
InvitedTalkが気になったけど,途中からしか参加できず,しかもあまりネットワークダイナミクスではなかったので,割愛.


The Role of Research Leaders on the Evolution of Scientific Communities 

- A group of leaders or influential members are able to affect the dynamics of entire community
Study the dnamics of Scientific communities
- Idenfity leader ships, community core
Data Source: dblp (computer science bibliography)
24 ACM SIGs Condiered => Leaders

Estimates a researchers' importance within a community
coresscore of researcher r to community c at time t is given by
Hindex = #rct
式を聞き逃したので,論文をチェック.

Core memvers are awarded
単にCoreScoreと色々な指標を比べたという感じ.

Resolving Homonymy with Correlation Clustering in Scholarly Digital Libraries. 

同音異義語を発見する
著者名とか

Classify papers by its authorship correctly
類似した内容の論文は同一著者のものが多いだろうと言うことでClustering
paper => point on m-dimensional space 
k-meansクラスタリングのやり方を工夫.
そこそこの出来か?
詳細は論文.

Examining Lists on Twitter to Uncover Relationships between Following, and Membership/Subscription. 

uncover information consumption patterns on twitter
relationship between listing following subscription

Listm following, subscribingの類似性と相違性は?
temporal relatoinshipsは?

DataSet:
907 Twitter users

List vs Following
Curators:
Substantial number of curators who have listed people without following

Subscribing vs Following
Distribution are more skew than L vs F
Curators follow 11%

Listing vs Subscribing
Listing and subscribing are different

L&F is similar

Temporal Analysis
どのようにL,F,Sの関係が移っていくのか分析

面白そうなので,あとで論文をチェックしよう.

Analyzing and Predicting Viral Tweets. 

Detection of Spam Tipping Behaviour on Foursquare. 

体力の限界につき断念

ブラジルは遠い.

0 件のコメント: